Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 233
Filter
1.
Lancet ; 402(10403): 731-746, 2023 08 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37562419

ABSTRACT

2023 marks the 20-year anniversary of the creation of Mexico's System of Social Protection for Health and the Seguro Popular, a model for the global quest to achieve universal health coverage through health system reform. We analyse the success and challenges after 2012, the consequences of reform ageing, and the unique coincidence of systemic reorganisation during the COVID-19 pandemic to identify strategies for health system disaster preparedness. We document that population health and financial protection improved as the Seguro Popular aged, despite erosion of the budget and absent needed reforms. The Seguro Popular closed in January, 2020, and Mexico embarked on a complex, extensive health system reorganisation. We posit that dismantling the Seguro Popular while trying to establish a new programme in 2020-21 made the Mexican health system more vulnerable in the worst pandemic period and shows the precariousness of evidence-based policy making to political polarisation and populism. Reforms should be designed to be flexible yet insulated from political volatility and constructed and managed to be structurally permeable and adaptable to new evidence to face changing health needs. Simultaneously, health systems should be grounded to withstand systemic shocks of politics and natural disasters.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Universal Health Insurance , Humans , Aged , Mexico/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Politics , Public Policy , Health Care Reform , Health Policy
2.
Lancet ; 400(10362): 1539-1556, 2022 10 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36522209

ABSTRACT

The education of health professionals substantially changed before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. A 2010 Lancet Commission examined the 100-year history of health-professional education, beginning with the 1910 Flexner report. Since the publication of the Lancet Commission, several transformative developments have happened, including in competency-based education, interprofessional education, and the large-scale application of information technology to education. Although the COVID-19 pandemic did not initiate these developments, it increased their implementation, and they are likely to have a long-term effect on health-professional education. They converge with other societal changes, such as globalisation of health care and increasing concerns of health disparities across the world, that were exacerbated by the pandemic. In this Health Policy, we list institutional and instructional reforms to assess what has happened to health-professional education since the publication of the Lancet Commission and how the COVID-19 pandemic altered the education process.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Health Personnel/education , Delivery of Health Care
4.
Salud Publica Mex ; 64(6, nov-dic): 565-568, 2022 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36750074

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the origins and content of the framework that guided the creation of the Center for Public Health Research in 1984 and the modernization of the School of Public of Health of Mexico, established in 1922. These two institutions eventually merged with the Center for Research in Infectious Disease to create, in 1987, the National Institute of Public Health of Mexico, one of the leading institutions of higher education and research in public health in the developing world.


Subject(s)
Public Health , Social Change , Humans , Public Health/education , Mexico , Schools
5.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 4: 100086, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34664040

ABSTRACT

We present a new concept, Punt Politics, and apply it to the COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) in two epicenters of the pandemic: Mexico and Brazil. Punt Politics refers to national leaders in federal systems deferring or deflecting responsibility for health systems decision-making to sub-national entities without evidence or coordination. The fragmentation of authority and overlapping functions in federal, decentralized political systems make them more susceptible to coordination problems than centralized, unitary systems. We apply the concept to pandemics, which require national health system stewardship, using sub-national NPI data that we developed and curated through the Observatory for the Containment of COVID-19 in the Americas to illustrate Punt Politics in Mexico and Brazil. Both countries suffer from protracted, high levels of COVID-19 mortality and inadequate pandemic responses, including little testing and disregard for scientific evidence. We illustrate how populist leadership drove Punt Politics and how partisan politics contributed to disabling an evidence-based response in Mexico and Brazil. These cases illustrate the combination of decentralization and populist leadership that is most conducive to punting responsibility. We discuss how Punt Politics reduces health system functionality, providing lessons for other countries and future pandemic responses, including vaccine rollout.

6.
N Engl J Med ; 385(10): 865-868, 2021 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34449188
7.
Salud pública Méx ; 63(1): 150-152, Jan.-Feb. 2021. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1395150
9.
Acta bioeth ; 26(2): 189-194, oct. 2020.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1141924

ABSTRACT

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to discuss one of the most common ethical predicaments faced by public health practitioners: the distribution of limited resources for health. The question we address is the following: If there are limited resources to provide necessary health care, how can we reasonably establish priorities? We discuss this question using as reference a real-life situation, which was the establishment of priorities in the design of a package of high-cost interventions for Seguro Popular in Mexico, a public insurance scheme that extended social protection in health to over 50 million people between 2003 and 2018. The main conclusion of this paper is that the use of explicit ethical assumptions in the design of public policies contribute to their acceptability and eventual success.


Resumen El propósito de este artículo es discutir uno de los dilemas éticos que con mayor frecuencia enfrentan quienes se dedican a la salud pública: la distribución de recursos limitados para la salud. La pregunta a la que se pretende responder es la siguiente: si existen recursos limitados para prestar los servicios de salud necesarios, ¿cómo podemos fijar prioridades? Intentamos responder a esta pregunta haciendo referencia a una situación de la vida real que fue el establecimiento de prioridades en el diseño de un paquete de intervenciones de alto costo para el Seguro Popular de México, un seguro público que extendió la protección social en salud a más de 50 millones de personas entre 2003 y 2018. La principal conclusión de este artículo es que el uso de un marco ético explícito en el diseño de las políticas públicas incrementa su aceptabilidad y favorece su eventual éxito.


Resumo O propósito deste artigo é discutir um dos dilemas éticos que com maior frequência aqueles que se dedicam à saúde pública enfrentam: a distribuição de recursos limitados para a saúde. A pergunta que se pretende responder é a seguinte: se existem recursos limitados para prestar os serviços de saúde necessários, como podemos fixar prioridades? Tentamos responder a esta pregunta fazendo referência a uma situação de vida real que foi o estabelecimento de prioridades na concepção de um pacote de intervenções de alto custo para o Seguro Popular do México, um seguro público que estendeu a proteção social em saúde a mais de 50 milhões de pessoas entre 2003 e 2018. A principal conclusão deste artigo é que o uso de um enquadramento ético explícito na concepção das políticas públicas aumenta sua aceitação e favorece seu eventual sucesso.


Subject(s)
Humans , Public Policy , Health , Health Care Reform , Ethics , Mexico
10.
Telemed J E Health ; 26(11): 1310-1313, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32809913

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the current experience and the flaws encountered in the rush to deploy telemedicine as a substitute for in-person care in response to the raging coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic; the preceding fault lines in the U.S. health care system that exacerbated the problem; and the importance of emerging from this calamity with a clear vision for necessary health care reforms. It starts with the premise that the precursors of catastrophes of this magnitude provide a valid basis for planning corrective measures, improved preparedness, and ultimately serious health reform. Such reform should include standardized protocols for proper deployment of telemedicine to triage patients to the appropriate level and source of care at the point of need, proper use of relevant technological innovations to deliver precision medicine, and the development of regional networks to coordinate and improve access to care while streamlining the care process. The other essential element is a universal payment system that puts the United States at par with the rest of the industrialized countries, regardless of variation among them. The ultimate goal is creating an efficient, effective, accessible, and equitable system of care. Although timing is uncertain, the pandemic will be brought under control. The path to a better future after the pandemic offers some consolation for the massive loss of life and treasure during this pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Triage/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/standards , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/standards , Triage/standards , United States/epidemiology
12.
Salud pública Méx ; 62(1): 114-117, ene.-feb. 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1365998

ABSTRACT

Resumen En este ensayo se discute la situación de la atención a la salud en Mesoamérica antes e inmediatamente después de 1519. En los primeros 50 años después de la Conquista, los españoles hicieron un uso muy extensivo de la medicina náhuatl. Sin embargo, con el tiempo, el ámbito de influencia de esta tradición se vio limitado debido a la rápida imposición de un sistema de atención muy diferente que poco aprovechó, entre otras cosas, la riqueza terapéutica de la medicina prehispánica.


Abstract This paper discusses the situation of healthcare in Mesoamerica before and immediately after 1519. In the first 50 years after the Conquest, the Spaniards made extensive use of Nahuatl medicine. However, the influence of this medical tradition was limited due to the rapid imposition of a very different medical system which took little advantage of, among other things, the therapeutic wealth of pre-Hispanic healing traditions.


Subject(s)
History, 15th Century , History, 16th Century , History, 17th Century , History, 18th Century , Delivery of Health Care/history , Medicine, Traditional/history , Delivery of Health Care/ethnology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Epidemics/history , Hospitals/history , Mexico
13.
Salud Publica Mex ; 62(1): 114-117, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31869568

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the situation of healthcare in Mesoamerica before and immediately after 1519. In the first 50 years after the Conquest, the Spaniards made extensive use of Nahuatl medicine. However, the influence of this medical tradition was limited due to the rapid imposition of a very different medical system which took little advantage of, among other things, the therapeutic wealth of pre-Hispanic healing traditions.


En este ensayo se discute la situación de la atención a la salud en Mesoamérica antes e inmediatamente después de 1519. En los primeros 50 años después de la Conquista, los españoles hicieron un uso muy extensivo de la medicina náhuatl. Sin embargo, con el tiempo, el ámbito de influencia de esta tradición se vio limitado debido a la rápida imposición de un sistema de atención muy diferente que poco aprovechó, entre otras cosas, la riqueza terapéutica de la medicina prehispánica.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/history , Medicine, Traditional/history , Delivery of Health Care/ethnology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Epidemics/history , History, 15th Century , History, 16th Century , History, 17th Century , History, 18th Century , Hospitals/history , Mexico
16.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(2): 202-211, 2019.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30958963

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the creation of the legal framework and the origin, growth and consolidation of the institutions and interventions (initiatives, programs and policies) that nourished public health in Mexico in the past century. It also discusses the recent efforts to guarantee universal social protection in health. This quest, which lasted a century, developed through three generations of reform that gave birth to a health system that offers protection against sanitary risks, protection of health care quality and financial protection to all the population in the country.


En este artículo se describen la creación de los marcos legales y el origen, crecimiento y consolidación de las instituciones e intervenciones (iniciativas, programas, políticas) que han conformado la salud pública moderna en México. También se discuten los esfuerzos recientes por hacer universal la protección social en salud. Esta gesta, que duró un siglo, se fue abriendo paso a través de tres generaciones de reformas que dieron lugar a un sistema de salud que hoy ofrece protección contra riesgos sanitarios, protección de la calidad de la atención y protección financiera a los habitantes de todo el país.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform/history , Public Health/history , Public Policy/history , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/history , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Mexico , Personal Health Services/history , Personal Health Services/organization & administration , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Right to Health/history
17.
Salud pública Méx ; 61(2): 202-211, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058973

ABSTRACT

Resumen: En este artículo se describen la creación de los marcos legales y el origen, crecimiento y consolidación de las instituciones e intervenciones (iniciativas, programas, políticas) que han conformado la salud pública moderna en México. También se discuten los esfuerzos recientes por hacer universal la protección social en salud. Esta gesta, que duró un siglo, se fue abriendo paso a través de tres generaciones de reformas que dieron lugar a un sistema de salud que hoy ofrece protección contra riesgos sanitarios, protección de la calidad de la atención y protección financiera a los habitantes de todo el país.


Abstract: This paper describes the creation of the legal framework and the origin, growth and consolidation of the institutions and interventions (initiatives, programs and policies) that nourished public health in Mexico in the past century. It also discusses the recent efforts to guarantee universal social protection in health. This quest, which lasted a century, developed through three generations of reform that gave birth to a health system that offers protection against sanitary risks, protection of health care quality and financial protection to all the population in the country.


Subject(s)
History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Public Policy/history , Public Health/history , Health Care Reform/history , Personal Health Services/history , Personal Health Services/organization & administration , Public Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Right to Health/history , Health Services Accessibility/history , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Mexico
20.
Public Health Rep ; 133(6): 759-766, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30309277

ABSTRACT

We documented lessons learned in the initial design and development of the new Harvard doctor of public health (DrPH) degree, an innovative professional public health doctorate designed to provide advanced education in the field of public health. Using data from program documents, personal participation in the development and administration of the degree, and initial students' results, we present key learnings from this experience and describe the program's goals and processes. Now entering its fifth year, the new Harvard DrPH program has enrolled about 70 students and graduated its first 2 classes in a program that combines advanced public health study with leadership development and field engagement. Development of this transformational innovation in advanced public health education required creative approaches to competency development and curriculum design, engagement of faculty to become supportive stakeholders, and substantial support for educational administration. Demand for a program of this type is strong. Continuous improvement is ongoing.


Subject(s)
Education, Public Health Professional , Leadership , Boston , Curriculum , Education, Graduate/methods , Education, Graduate/organization & administration , Education, Public Health Professional/methods , Education, Public Health Professional/organization & administration , Humans , Program Development
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...